LUMUMBA

Before the European contact on the African continent, their intentions were strictly free trade through Africa’s rich land resources. They went there to rule the whole  African continent and nothing less. But when they met freedom fighters like Patrice Lumumba, their ruling and control was shattered because independence was the symbolized freedom for Lumumba and he never exchanged it for nothing more or less. Patrice Lumumba became the first National Prime minister of Democratic Republic of Congo. But prior to his appointment, he went to Stanleyville as a third class postal worker and there he spread the word of independence. He made the people believe in themselves so much. Lumumba escaped the obstacles set before him and was soon invited to the round table conference in Brussels.

            In the round table conference, Lumumba requested Congo’s declaration of independence to be finalized in June 30^th. Lumumba achieved his goal and this goal came with more obstacles. The Belgians were not ready to let Congo be an independent country but the freedom fighter Lumumba made sure it happened. After Congo gained their independence, the Belgians felt the Congo government wasn’t very experienced to handle its people because the Congolese were raping and killing compatriots therefore they were going to render aid to the Congo government by giving them a solution to regulate and control its people; but Lumumba refused. This was a form of contradiction because the Belgian government still wanted to some way somehow control the Congolese; in other words the people of Congo they felt must remain under their rule. An example was established when the Belgian ambassador visited Lumumba and offered him solutions to use to control his people; when Lumumba made it clear that he didn’t need their assistance, the ambassador stated, “If you decline my offer, we will consult our Atlantic partners” (Lumumba part 5). This was a clarification that the Belgians contradicted themselves when they granted Congo their independence.

EUROPEAN TAKE OVER AFRICA

Being dominant and the thought of bring peace to the Africans was one thing whiles governing and transmuting them to the Europeans liking was another. Prior to 1884, the European colonies had limited themselves in the involvement in the traditional land of Africa. They took cautious steps in securing the power to rule. The colonies as a whole believed Africa was a “no man land” therefore they took measures in building new sates and implementing their own laws and regulations through which the Africans were going to have to follow. Their idea and goal was to take over the economy of the African continent going through their political leaders.

            The Britain started off with their official policy formulated by Lord Fredrick Lugard, a Nigeria High commissioner; this was they referred to as “indirect rule”. With the tradition of the of the African culture being incompatible to the Britain’s, they planned to change the political system to gain power over the people but they couldn’t wipe out the leaders right away; they therefore decided unless they partially maintain Africans political structure and other institutions and instead act as their advisors, their intention to rule the continent will be unsuccessful. For example, they kept traditional kings and chiefs in power as well as the ethnic loyalties and traditions governing marriage and land. In addition, they allowed the continuation of the African languages to be spoken in couple of western schools in the colonies which in return they believe “would guarantee their success of the colonial experiment, ensure everlasting peace, and require the use of fewer financial resources” (Azevedo, 116); in other words, if the Britain’s shared political power with the African leaders (kings, chiefs, etc.), they will feel as important and that could possibly prevent them from rebellion against the Britain’s. In addition, the Britain will also get cheap labor by recruiting or better yet forcing the Africans, which will evidently fairly less cost.

With the colonies main target being power and wealth, the African economy was definitely going to suffer as a consequence. The European began disturbing the peace of Africa’s economy when they forced African authorities and gave them additional power through which their main responsibility was to collect taxes, conscript manpower for involuntary labor and the military; as well as controlling the harvest of certain cash crops in their region—these mistreatment led to African authorities susceptibility because they were seen as tools of colonialism. Note, the taxes that were impose on the African continent weren’t beneficiary to them in any kind of way and “the cash crops made the newly carved territories dependent on one or two commodities that, following independence, became a source of problem when Africans made an attempt to diversify the economy. Furthermore, international fluctuation of consumer needs and resulting prices made Africans economies vulnerable to external forces, and the emphasis on exports overlooked the real needs of the Africans” (Azevedo, 118). Also, from the movie The History of Racism, King Leopold II; who was full of greed sent somebody to Congo to secure that country for him; on that part of the continent, he created a scene as though he was willing to educate what he called the “savage people”. He formed ninety-thousand strong army some of which were Africans to go to village after village; there they seized women from their husbands and forced men to go to the farms to collect a monthly quota of wild robber. This continued for 20 years therefore there weren’t people in the village to do what a normal community will do to feed itself such as fishing, harvesting, farming, etc.—Congo as a result died from over labor and starvation.   African’s primarily relying on one or two agricultural goods were pretty disturbing with the simple fact that they basically didn’t have anybody to sell these goods internationally.

As it has been briefly elaborated above, the exports were strictly in favor of the processing of products overseas, consequently divesting the Africans of industrial plants. Everything and anything the colonies touched on the continent politically, economically, (taxes, railways, harbors), and other amenities that were built to sternly expedite the exports of merchandises from industrious areas to European markets and plants. Africans as being told through history remained the major tank of economical labor for the European government, companies, and enterprises until they gained individuality.  

Quilombo

There are many parts to the history of slavery. Slavery has been in an existence since the 15^th century; and as slavery went on, slaves became more and more rebellious like those in Jamaica. They acquired this attitude not because they were fans of violence but because they were rather tired of the cruelty and brutality they endured daily.

            Slaves were taken from Africa to what they called the “New World” with Jamaica being one of them. It has been told that the African Slaves that were taken to Jamaica were very rebellious. Most slaves in Jamaica were runaway slaves and they as the Maroons—they fought masters until both sides came to an agreement; they could often negotiate with the colonial authorities and use that as a means of making their condition better (Oxford Journals, 376). They always had a different way of resisting their masters—sometimes violently and other times explicably. Sometimes the authorities would also negotiate with the Maroon leader by making a freedom treaty—this treaty didn’t not give them all freedom they needed; meaning there were restrictions of what when they can and cannot do. In addition, another treaty was concluded in 1749. This was called the peace treaty; it was mainly because the maroon group and their violent attitudes destroyed the Dutch settlers. This particular group was very influential on the slave rebellions and resistance in many different ways; the maroons were looked up to for hope by those who were still in bondage. Their existence was a challenge to those in bondage—it strengthened their weakness and sort of assured they could also fight and succeed in becoming free.

            Another predominant group was the Akan’s. The Akans during the time they were forced to come into the new world brought with them their traditional religious practices from back home( Gold Coast) in which they believed in. interestingly enough, the planters didn’t consider that as threat; this wasn’t close to their worries. Their concern was concentrated more on how equipped the slaves were in working on the plantation fields. There were times where the slaves used their traditional practices (Voodoo) to magically dodge gun bullets; this was done by having powder all over their body and so on and so forth. “Once African religious ceremonies were proscribed, magic still persisted and it was so well adapted to going underground” (Oxford Journals 383). This group also had its influential part to part to play. Their traditional religious practice did not only unify them but it also sort of a suitable reason that paved the way for the slaves to gather and communicate amongst themselves. There

      

There are many parts to the history of slavery. Slavery has been in an existence since the 15^th century; and as slavery went on, slaves became more and more rebellious like those in Jamaica. They acquired this attitude not because they were fans of violence but because they were rather tired of the cruelty and brutality they endured daily.

            Slaves were taken from Africa to what they called the “New World” with Jamaica being one of them. It has been told that the African Slaves that were taken to Jamaica were very rebellious. Most slaves in Jamaica were runaway slaves and they as the Maroons—they fought masters until both sides came to an agreement; they could often negotiate with the colonial authorities and use that as a means of making their condition better (Oxford Journals, 376). They always had a different way of resisting their masters—sometimes violently and other times explicably. Sometimes the authorities would also negotiate with the Maroon leader by making a freedom treaty—this treaty didn’t not give them all freedom they needed; meaning there were restrictions of what when they can and cannot do. In addition, another treaty was concluded in 1749. This was called the peace treaty; it was mainly because the maroon group and their violent attitudes destroyed the Dutch settlers. This particular group was very influential on the slave rebellions and resistance in many different ways; the maroons were looked up to for hope by those who were still in bondage. Their existence was a challenge to those in bondage—it strengthened their weakness and sort of assured they could also fight and succeed in becoming free.

            Another predominant group was the Akan’s. The Akans during the time they were forced to come into the new world brought with them their traditional religious practices from back home( Gold Coast) in which they believed in. interestingly enough, the planters didn’t consider that as threat; this wasn’t close to their worries. Their concern was concentrated more on how equipped the slaves were in working on the plantation fields. There were times where the slaves used their traditional practices (Voodoo) to magically dodge gun bullets; this was done by having powder all over their body and so on and so forth. “Once African religious ceremonies were proscribed, magic still persisted and it was so well adapted to going underground” (Oxford Journals 383). This group also had its influential part to part to play. Their traditional religious practice did not only unify them but it also sort of a suitable reason that paved the way for the slaves to gather and communicate amongst themselves.