Sunday, February 10, 2013

Quilombo


There are many parts to the history of slavery. Slavery has been in an existence since the 15th century; and as slavery went on, slaves became more and more rebellious like those in Jamaica. They acquired this attitude not because they were fans of violence but because they were rather tired of the cruelty and brutality they endured daily.

            Slaves were taken from Africa to what they called the “New World” with Jamaica being one of them. It has been told that the African Slaves that were taken to Jamaica were very rebellious. Most slaves in Jamaica were runaway slaves and they as the Maroons—they fought masters until both sides came to an agreement; they could often negotiate with the colonial authorities and use that as a means of making their condition better (Oxford Journals, 376). They always had a different way of resisting their masters—sometimes violently and other times explicably. Sometimes the authorities would also negotiate with the Maroon leader by making a freedom treaty—this treaty didn’t not give them all freedom they needed; meaning there were restrictions of what when they can and cannot do. In addition, another treaty was concluded in 1749. This was called the peace treaty; it was mainly because the maroon group and their violent attitudes destroyed the Dutch settlers. This particular group was very influential on the slave rebellions and resistance in many different ways; the maroons were looked up to for hope by those who were still in bondage. Their existence was a challenge to those in bondage—it strengthened their weakness and sort of assured they could also fight and succeed in becoming free.

            Another predominant group was the Akan’s. The Akans during the time they were forced to come into the new world brought with them their traditional religious practices from back home( Gold Coast) in which they believed in. interestingly enough, the planters didn’t consider that as threat; this wasn’t close to their worries. Their concern was concentrated more on how equipped the slaves were in working on the plantation fields. There were times where the slaves used their traditional practices (Voodoo) to magically dodge gun bullets; this was done by having powder all over their body and so on and so forth. “Once African religious ceremonies were proscribed, magic still persisted and it was so well adapted to going underground” (Oxford Journals 383). This group also had its influential part to part to play. Their traditional religious practice did not only unify them but it also sort of a suitable reason that paved the way for the slaves to gather and communicate amongst themselves. There
      

There are many parts to the history of slavery. Slavery has been in an existence since the 15th century; and as slavery went on, slaves became more and more rebellious like those in Jamaica. They acquired this attitude not because they were fans of violence but because they were rather tired of the cruelty and brutality they endured daily.

            Slaves were taken from Africa to what they called the “New World” with Jamaica being one of them. It has been told that the African Slaves that were taken to Jamaica were very rebellious. Most slaves in Jamaica were runaway slaves and they as the Maroons—they fought masters until both sides came to an agreement; they could often negotiate with the colonial authorities and use that as a means of making their condition better (Oxford Journals, 376). They always had a different way of resisting their masters—sometimes violently and other times explicably. Sometimes the authorities would also negotiate with the Maroon leader by making a freedom treaty—this treaty didn’t not give them all freedom they needed; meaning there were restrictions of what when they can and cannot do. In addition, another treaty was concluded in 1749. This was called the peace treaty; it was mainly because the maroon group and their violent attitudes destroyed the Dutch settlers. This particular group was very influential on the slave rebellions and resistance in many different ways; the maroons were looked up to for hope by those who were still in bondage. Their existence was a challenge to those in bondage—it strengthened their weakness and sort of assured they could also fight and succeed in becoming free.

            Another predominant group was the Akan’s. The Akans during the time they were forced to come into the new world brought with them their traditional religious practices from back home( Gold Coast) in which they believed in. interestingly enough, the planters didn’t consider that as threat; this wasn’t close to their worries. Their concern was concentrated more on how equipped the slaves were in working on the plantation fields. There were times where the slaves used their traditional practices (Voodoo) to magically dodge gun bullets; this was done by having powder all over their body and so on and so forth. “Once African religious ceremonies were proscribed, magic still persisted and it was so well adapted to going underground” (Oxford Journals 383). This group also had its influential part to part to play. Their traditional religious practice did not only unify them but it also sort of a suitable reason that paved the way for the slaves to gather and communicate amongst themselves. 
      

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Wonders of The African World


The Trans-Atlantic slave trade took place around the mid-fifteenth century when the Portuguese grew interest in the African continent. The lack of work force in their country might have pushed them to Africa; but who knows? The slave trade continued till the nineteenth century. The immense majority of slaves who were brought to the new world were known to be from West and Central part of Africa (Ghana, Benin, Dahume and etc.). In addition to the Portuguese, British, Dutch, French, American and surprisingly, Africans themselves played a role in the slave trade—scholars argue that the countries from the New world forced themselves in the African continent to recruit slaves whiles others argue that Africans ( Chiefs, Kings, etc.) or the Middleman initiated slavery first. Slaves in Africa were habitually criminal individuals who had unpaid debts and had to work till their debt were paid off and as Paul Lovejoy noted, “[…] slaves in African societies were absolute property or chattel of their owners […] (Azevedo, 74)”; whereas in the Americas, slaves were not personal ownership of other human lives; they are actually able to buy their freedom and obtain societal elevation. Although all either side of the scholars’ allegation may be true, it doesn’t permit any human being on this earth to sell or exchange another human’s life for money or goods. That is true “greed”!
            Many countries were involved in the slave trade including the African continent itself. Before the arrival of the Europeans, slavery existed in Africa (Ghana)—there were people in the palace who serves the chiefs, kings and their generation. Let’s take my homeland, Ghana for example “it appears that the large numbers of Africans were enslaved and forced to work in the Gold coast mines prior to European contact” ( Azevedo, 75). When the foreigners from the new world arrived in Ghana, they realized that they had well established political systems in an inhumane manner; in other words, they had Kings, Chiefs and others whom the people respected, followed, and worshiped. Also, the foreigners discovered well established economic systems in terms of trade, wealth and so on as teacher Akosua Apaabi referred to in the video. This underlines the argument of some scholars that, slavery were in existence before the Europeans arrived indoors and also being born in Ghana, I witnessed rich families who had maids and servants who did house chores, ran errands, and did so many other things that the rich themselves will not do. Also, traders also ask permission from kings to build forts and castles (Elmina) where they will keep the slaves that weren’t able to fit the first boat trip; surprisingly, their permissions were granted by the Ghanaian leaders and rent was paid to keep their fellow African in the castles—what I call “The Cage”.
            In addition, the Ashanti tribe was known to have sold and exchange lots of their own people. For example, “The Akan gold miners and African authorities paid the Portuguese traders in gold in exchange for the slaves provided. Likewise, other Europeans, including the English, the Dutch, the Danes, entered the trade and provided slaves in exchange for gold with the Akan people” (Azevedo, 75). Africans in general—Ghanaians to be precise believed they were getting what they needed (force labor) from the Europeans and that was what mattered at that time. They didn’t think far to consider the effects they were dragging upon themselves in the later future; as in the video, Wonders of the African World, Dr. Louis visited Quidah and learned a bit about Don Francisco who had over 90 children with all African women. Dr. Louis discovered how Don Francisco ruled Quidah by directing a road straight to the beach where the Europeans had their boats and ships waiting for their chained slaves. When Dr. Louis arrived on the beach, he found broken glasses of wine sitting on the sand—left over of the exchange goods; he then said that Africans today are suffering from its own curse from selling its own people. Africans at the time they were building what they might have referred to as “partners”, didn’t think that these same partners will force and make their own way of recruiting slaves. Its effects are being suffered today.
            The African perspectives provide a context to better understand the slave trade because it goes into detail about the truth of where, when, and how it began. It also provided specific examples noted in the above paragraphs about the role the African continent played in recruiting slavery; the context has made it clear that the Europeans weren’t the full initiators even though they went along with it after they discovered the wealth in Africa—especially Ghana ( Gold Coast). Even though the context has given some clarification  about this part of the African history, the arguments circulating about it still hangs; scholars and some Africans from the video Wonders of the African World  believe that if Africans themselves hadn’t sold their people, there was no way the Europeans would’ve had the right to enlarge and recruit slavery. Opponents argue that the Europeans were and are responsible for slavery on the African continent.     

Sunday, January 27, 2013

TRIPLE HERITAGE


Ali Mazrui in the video Triple Heritage described the detailed geography of Africa and it has molded its people. His main point of this discussion was the triple heritage of Africa which includes the influences of traditional Africa, Islam and the West. Ali Mazrui himself experienced the triple heritage as a child when he spoke three different languages at three different places: Swahili at home Arabic in the Mosque, and English at school. He goes on to explain how the seaboard in the east allowed the entry of the foreign influence.
Traditionally, Africans inclined to stay close to nature because their belief was what was near was dear. Although Africans were attracted in the sustenance the ocean had to offer, they weren’t interested in all; what lied beyond the distance didn’t matter to them. Captivatingly, parts of Africa such as Senegal and others referred to their men as hunters—primarily because they go out to fetch for food (fishing) to provide for their family. In addition, the women are referred to as the mothers—most of the time because they take care of home in terms of cooking, cleaning and taking care of the children; women as Ali Mazrui will refer to them as “cultivators, market women, and negotiators”—multi-tasking and business women. They contributed equally to the economy as men. In relation to the role play of both men and women in traditional Africa is an example from A survey of Africa and the African Diaspora, “Dahomey, which flourished in West Africa until it was conquered by the French during the nineteenth century, is remembered for the absolute power of its rulers and by the fact that women shared civilian and military responsibilities with men” (Azevedo 67). This example notes what Ali Muzrui meant by women are equally as central to the economy as men—both men and women are capable of uplifting the economy of their country.
During the 7th century of the Christian era came “the new cry of Islam” as Ali Muazrui would call it, making its way in Africa. The Islamic Religion penetrated through the North part of Africa spreading the wings of its languages across the continent. The Islamic culture established itself properly in North Africa largely because it authenticated the eminence placed on water as heaven became connected with water. The Islamic religion influenced Africa in many ways that changed Africa; this new religion obligated the people of Africa into a disciplinary world in other words it gave them a new sense of direction—“they faced East to pray” (Mazrui, Triple Heritage).
The end of Africa was determined by the Europeans. The Suez Canal initiated the power of the Europeans and they began forecasting about how they can suppress the continent; they began colonizing Africa as they settled. Whiles they made their way in Africa, they brought with them new belief (Christianity), style of dressing (already made, suits), food (French bread), etc. Both the new cry of Islam and Christianity has directed Africans from their normal path—nature’s way. The Lunda Empire in Zaire for example was well structured in administrative system of justice and tax collection before the arrival of the Europeans; the introduction and the swift expansion of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade and the later colonization caused the divider of Africa. (Azevedo, 68). The European settlers took away the power of rulers of Africa; they have negatively influenced the African continent politically, economically, culturally.